<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Scott Kuhagen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scottkuhagen.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scottkuhagen.com</link>
	<description>Law student; thoughts on constitutional, immigration, and public interest law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 19:23:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on DHS Ordered to Produce Documents on Immigration Checks on Amtrak by Controversy over Border Patrol Arrests on Amtrak near the U.S.-Canada border &#124; Scott Kuhagen</title>
		<link>http://scottkuhagen.com/2011/06/23/dhs-ordered-to-produce-documents-on-immigration-checks-on-amtrak/#comment-359</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Controversy over Border Patrol Arrests on Amtrak near the U.S.-Canada border &#124; Scott Kuhagen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 19:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottkuhagen.com/?p=578#comment-359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] McCommons&#8217; suspicion that the practice was quite routine, indeed. After Families for Freedom successfully sued for access to Homeland Security records about such arrests on transportation near the northern [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] McCommons&#8217; suspicion that the practice was quite routine, indeed. After Families for Freedom successfully sued for access to Homeland Security records about such arrests on transportation near the northern [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Not All Free Law is Created Equal by Voting, Race in America, Black Voices, Color of Change, Tom Joyner Morning show, Michael Baston, Steve Harvey Show, black Radio, Black Bloggers, Civil Rights, ACLU, NAACP,</title>
		<link>http://scottkuhagen.com/2012/02/21/not-all-free-law-is-created-equal/#comment-356</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Voting, Race in America, Black Voices, Color of Change, Tom Joyner Morning show, Michael Baston, Steve Harvey Show, black Radio, Black Bloggers, Civil Rights, ACLU, NAACP,]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 04:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottkuhagen.com/?p=770#comment-356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[whoah this weblog is wonderful i like studying your articles. Stay up the good work! You recognize, a lot of people are looking around for this info, you could help them greatly.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>whoah this weblog is wonderful i like studying your articles. Stay up the good work! You recognize, a lot of people are looking around for this info, you could help them greatly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Initial Thoughts on the Lexis Advance User Experience by Dinyar Mehta</title>
		<link>http://scottkuhagen.com/2011/11/02/initial-thoughts-on-the-lexis-advance-user-experience/#comment-302</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dinyar Mehta]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 23:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottkuhagen.com/?p=698#comment-302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For customers who subscribe to WestlawNext, the vast majority choose to pay a flat rate each month. The price of Search is included in their subscription, so they can run as many searches as they want without changing their monthly bill.  This is similar for document views, like reading a  case. The vast majority of our customers subscribe to a package of content (cases, statutes, secondary sources, etc.), and reading those documents is always covered by their monthly bill.   You referenced Professor Wheeler&#039;s article which referred to our pricing guide. The pricing guide is there to help customers understand retail prices for content outside of their subscription.

Given the interesting topics of discussion raised, your readers might also benefit from reading these blog posts in Jason Wilson&#039;s Blog: rethinc.k (http://rethinck.com).  They are a series of interviews that Jason had with MIke Dahn, SVP at Thomson Reuters: 

http://www.jasnwilsn.com/2011/10/03/on-westlaw/

http://www.jasnwilsn.com/2011/10/05/part-2-on-westlawnext-westsearch-and-haters-a-brief-interview-with-mike-dahn-of-thomson-reuters/

http://www.jasnwilsn.com/2011/10/14/on-westlawnext-more-mike-dahn-responds-to-your-comments/

Thanks very much!

Dinyar Mehta
(Director, WestlawNext Product Development)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For customers who subscribe to WestlawNext, the vast majority choose to pay a flat rate each month. The price of Search is included in their subscription, so they can run as many searches as they want without changing their monthly bill.  This is similar for document views, like reading a  case. The vast majority of our customers subscribe to a package of content (cases, statutes, secondary sources, etc.), and reading those documents is always covered by their monthly bill.   You referenced Professor Wheeler&#8217;s article which referred to our pricing guide. The pricing guide is there to help customers understand retail prices for content outside of their subscription.</p>
<p>Given the interesting topics of discussion raised, your readers might also benefit from reading these blog posts in Jason Wilson&#8217;s Blog: rethinc.k (<a href="http://rethinck.com" rel="nofollow">http://rethinck.com</a>).  They are a series of interviews that Jason had with MIke Dahn, SVP at Thomson Reuters: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.jasnwilsn.com/2011/10/03/on-westlaw/" rel="nofollow">http://www.jasnwilsn.com/2011/10/03/on-westlaw/</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.jasnwilsn.com/2011/10/05/part-2-on-westlawnext-westsearch-and-haters-a-brief-interview-with-mike-dahn-of-thomson-reuters/" rel="nofollow">http://www.jasnwilsn.com/2011/10/05/part-2-on-westlawnext-westsearch-and-haters-a-brief-interview-with-mike-dahn-of-thomson-reuters/</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.jasnwilsn.com/2011/10/14/on-westlawnext-more-mike-dahn-responds-to-your-comments/" rel="nofollow">http://www.jasnwilsn.com/2011/10/14/on-westlawnext-more-mike-dahn-responds-to-your-comments/</a></p>
<p>Thanks very much!</p>
<p>Dinyar Mehta<br />
(Director, WestlawNext Product Development)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Initial Thoughts on the Lexis Advance User Experience by skuhagen</title>
		<link>http://scottkuhagen.com/2011/11/02/initial-thoughts-on-the-lexis-advance-user-experience/#comment-295</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[skuhagen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 00:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottkuhagen.com/?p=698#comment-295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Indeed! 

Regarding narrowing a search, I suppose it would be included with the flat-rate pricing for solo practitioners (http://www.lawsitesblog.com/2010/10/lexisnexis-rolls-out-lexis-advance-for-solos.html). For firm associates using Lexis Advance, it appears the entire service is free/included if your firm already had an existing Lexis contract (http://www.geeklawblog.com/2011/03/new-lexis-version-20-lexis-advance-for.html) -- a service that was originally, but no longer, called &quot;Lexis Advance for Associates (http://www.iphonejd.com/iphone_jd/2011/09/details-on-upcoming-lexis-advance-for-ipad.html).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed! </p>
<p>Regarding narrowing a search, I suppose it would be included with the flat-rate pricing for solo practitioners (<a href="http://www.lawsitesblog.com/2010/10/lexisnexis-rolls-out-lexis-advance-for-solos.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.lawsitesblog.com/2010/10/lexisnexis-rolls-out-lexis-advance-for-solos.html</a>). For firm associates using Lexis Advance, it appears the entire service is free/included if your firm already had an existing Lexis contract (<a href="http://www.geeklawblog.com/2011/03/new-lexis-version-20-lexis-advance-for.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.geeklawblog.com/2011/03/new-lexis-version-20-lexis-advance-for.html</a>) &#8212; a service that was originally, but no longer, called &#8220;Lexis Advance for Associates (<a href="http://www.iphonejd.com/iphone_jd/2011/09/details-on-upcoming-lexis-advance-for-ipad.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.iphonejd.com/iphone_jd/2011/09/details-on-upcoming-lexis-advance-for-ipad.html</a>).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Initial Thoughts on the Lexis Advance User Experience by Meg Lulofs (@librarylulu)</title>
		<link>http://scottkuhagen.com/2011/11/02/initial-thoughts-on-the-lexis-advance-user-experience/#comment-294</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Meg Lulofs (@librarylulu)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 20:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottkuhagen.com/?p=698#comment-294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How odd that pinpoint cites don&#039;t appear with copy &amp; paste. That was one of my favorite things about regular Lexis. Boo. From a cost perspective: I wonder if narrowing your search is still included within the price of the initial search, and if so, does Advance offer better narrowing options? That would appeal to me if I were a librarian that had to pay for stuff.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How odd that pinpoint cites don&#8217;t appear with copy &amp; paste. That was one of my favorite things about regular Lexis. Boo. From a cost perspective: I wonder if narrowing your search is still included within the price of the initial search, and if so, does Advance offer better narrowing options? That would appeal to me if I were a librarian that had to pay for stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Administration appeals Alabama immigration law decision by Deportation Defense &#124; Green Card Immigration Lawyer</title>
		<link>http://scottkuhagen.com/2011/10/12/administration-appeals-alabama-immigration-law-decision/#comment-290</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deportation Defense &#124; Green Card Immigration Lawyer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 10:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottkuhagen.com/?p=682#comment-290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] &amp; Petit Larceny) &amp; The Petty Offense ExceptionDeception and Disorder in Immigration CourtAdministration appeals Alabama immigration law decision body { background-image: [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &amp; Petit Larceny) &amp; The Petty Offense ExceptionDeception and Disorder in Immigration CourtAdministration appeals Alabama immigration law decision body { background-image: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Administration appeals Alabama immigration law decision by Dave Francis</title>
		<link>http://scottkuhagen.com/2011/10/12/administration-appeals-alabama-immigration-law-decision/#comment-283</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Francis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 23:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottkuhagen.com/?p=682#comment-283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MAKE YOUR VOICE KNOWN TODAY OR (THIS WEEK) ON E-VERIFY

JOBS--the economy has everything to do with illegal immigration, and as more and more of these unfortunate people pour in from the borders or from across the world. The expenditure will keep rising for every US taxpayer, until Congress does something about it; it does no-way mean amnesty. We have the resources to stop this massive invasion, but neither party has relentlessly pursued it. President Obama had great intentions for a while, than fell off in the wrong direction.  Only the TEA PARTY lawmakers in straw polls have openly spoke about the financial ramifications, while main GOP members remain silent, as do the Democrats. With 20 million citizens out of work, we as citizens and legal residents must insure that our borders are sealed and that internal enforcement is substantial. There are numerous laws moving through Congress, but the &quot;Legal Workforce Act&quot; has the power to slowly but surely drive the foreign workers out of the jobs, meant for our own people. 

The Immigration Control and Reform Act (IRCA) mandates procedures for business owners to verify the employment eligibility of their workforce, but since the 1986 law it has loosely applied until our prior president George H.W. Bush implemented Pilot program called E-Verify in October 1991. The Congressional authorization for the E-Verify electronic employment eligibility confirmation for employees was to expire on November 1, 2008. Republican Senator Jeff Sessions introduced an amendment in 2009 that would have made E-Verify permanent and mandatory for all construction companies, although Senator Harry Reid did would not allow the bill to come up for a vote. Reid&#039;s contention was, “We need to do comprehensive immigration reform. We cannot do it piecemeal,&quot; In July 2010 a reporter In Las Vegas said, “When you go to the unemployment office there&#039;s many U.S. citizens who are unemployed--construction workers and they don&#039;t have jobs because right now, some of those construction companies find it easier to hire undocumented workers.&quot;

If President Obama’s “Job Stimulus” had passed in the Senate yesterday, one of its sections was the “Construction” projects. So who are the jobs going to, without the guarantee that Contractors and sub-contractors are going to hire labor—Americans and Green Card Recipients? Without federal programs as the policing LEGAL WORKFORCE ACT” Secure Communities, the 287 (G) unethical employers can still bypass immigration laws and they will for more profit. This is the equivalent circumstances of any company, which includes Farmers and the agrarian industries who are cheating US workers of jobs.  We can remove illegal alien criminals and so called law abiding illegal’s at the same time?

Rep. Lamar Smiths “LEGAL WORKFORCE ACT” (H.R. 2885) HELP THE WORKING AMERICANS AND STOP THESE TRAVESTIES OF OUR LAWS.  E-Verify will be a very successful supplement to stopping the illegality of people with foreign status from taking jobs.


The website NumbersUSA is the only outspoken, pro-sovereignty group, which identifies the grading records on a chart that is open to anybodies scrutiny. Below you can see next to every personage in the presidential election, their relative grade and the informational pressing issue of E-Verify.

 
There are two things that the average American can do, is by adding pressure to mostly the adversity of certain politicians. These reluctant politicians must be bombarded with your calls and free faxes, compliments of NumbersUSA.  Contact Speaker of the House John Boehner (R-OH); House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA); House Majority Whip Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) ; House Chairman of Ways &amp; Means Committee Dave Camp (R-MI);  &amp; Members of the Ways &amp; Means Committee. NEBRASKA, Rep. Berg, Rick (GOP) (202-225-2611) ; NEBRASKA, Rep. Smith, Adrian (GOP) (202-225-6435); LOUISIANA, Rep. Boustany, Charles (GOP) (202-225-2031); MICHIGAN, Rep. Camp, Dave (GOP) (202-225-3561) &amp; (202-225-2031); KENTUCKY, Rep. Davis, Geoff (GOP) (202-225-3465); PENNSYLVANIA, Rep. Gerlach, Jim (GOP) (202-225-4315); KANSAS, Rep. Jenkins, Lynn (GOP)(202-225-6601); MINNESOTA, Rep. Paulsen, Erik (GOP)(202-225-2871); WASHINGTON, Rep. Reichert, Dave (GOP) (202-225-7761); WISCONSIN, Rep. Ryan, Paul (GOP) (202-225-3031) You can additionally contact your own local Senator or Representative or federal politician at 202-224-3121 and insist on E-Verify. Tell them that your voting will depend how you vote on E-Verify—NOW!



At this present time Rick Perry (D-) endorsed E-Verify, but having his reservations, he also called building a 1,200-mile fence the length of the border “idiocy” If we don’t “secure the Border” America is not only open to economic aliens, but dangerous foreigners who will come here- to kill us.   Mitt Romney (C-) at the Conservative Political Action Conference that he supports an E-Verify system, along with Herman Cain (C-) who has qualified himself as a true TEA PARTY member. Michele Bachman (B-), Tea Party chairman believes employers should be required to check the legal status of people they hire with E-Verify. Rep. Newt Gingrich (D-) has not spoken explicitly about E-Verify; he has suggested that credit card companies should run a worker-verification program. Jon Huntsman (D-) said he would consider a requirement that employers use the e-Verify system to check the documentation of workers to ensure they&#039;re legally employable. Rick Santorum (F), called Mr. Perry “soft on illegal immigration” during the debate, in Orlando, Fla., and framed the issue as a burden to taxpayers. Gary Johnson (F) has also stated, “Enact an application and tracking procedure for guest workers, such as an e-verify system.” Finally Ron Paul (F), who has never answered how he stands on the Illegal alien alerter E-Verify, as he is more interested as it stands on Privacy rights.


Attn: Not all of the thousands of TEA PARTY groups are of the same voice relating to the Presidential contenders. The ad being shown on TV is not the main definition of any particular candidate of any member yet?  Not all TEA PARTY branches are supporting Governor of Texas Rick Perry.  The TEA PARTY—is the American people—of every color, race and religious faith. Everybody qualifies to be a member, as long it entered the United States legally. THE TEA PARTY stands with Arizona, Alabama, Georgia, Indiana, South Carolina and other state policing laws, to save these individual states—ECONOMIC –illegal migrants and immigrants expenditures forced on them by unfunded mandates. The Tea Party will battle against any amnesties or any illegal immigration covert programs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MAKE YOUR VOICE KNOWN TODAY OR (THIS WEEK) ON E-VERIFY</p>
<p>JOBS&#8211;the economy has everything to do with illegal immigration, and as more and more of these unfortunate people pour in from the borders or from across the world. The expenditure will keep rising for every US taxpayer, until Congress does something about it; it does no-way mean amnesty. We have the resources to stop this massive invasion, but neither party has relentlessly pursued it. President Obama had great intentions for a while, than fell off in the wrong direction.  Only the TEA PARTY lawmakers in straw polls have openly spoke about the financial ramifications, while main GOP members remain silent, as do the Democrats. With 20 million citizens out of work, we as citizens and legal residents must insure that our borders are sealed and that internal enforcement is substantial. There are numerous laws moving through Congress, but the &#8220;Legal Workforce Act&#8221; has the power to slowly but surely drive the foreign workers out of the jobs, meant for our own people. </p>
<p>The Immigration Control and Reform Act (IRCA) mandates procedures for business owners to verify the employment eligibility of their workforce, but since the 1986 law it has loosely applied until our prior president George H.W. Bush implemented Pilot program called E-Verify in October 1991. The Congressional authorization for the E-Verify electronic employment eligibility confirmation for employees was to expire on November 1, 2008. Republican Senator Jeff Sessions introduced an amendment in 2009 that would have made E-Verify permanent and mandatory for all construction companies, although Senator Harry Reid did would not allow the bill to come up for a vote. Reid&#8217;s contention was, “We need to do comprehensive immigration reform. We cannot do it piecemeal,&#8221; In July 2010 a reporter In Las Vegas said, “When you go to the unemployment office there&#8217;s many U.S. citizens who are unemployed&#8211;construction workers and they don&#8217;t have jobs because right now, some of those construction companies find it easier to hire undocumented workers.&#8221;</p>
<p>If President Obama’s “Job Stimulus” had passed in the Senate yesterday, one of its sections was the “Construction” projects. So who are the jobs going to, without the guarantee that Contractors and sub-contractors are going to hire labor—Americans and Green Card Recipients? Without federal programs as the policing LEGAL WORKFORCE ACT” Secure Communities, the 287 (G) unethical employers can still bypass immigration laws and they will for more profit. This is the equivalent circumstances of any company, which includes Farmers and the agrarian industries who are cheating US workers of jobs.  We can remove illegal alien criminals and so called law abiding illegal’s at the same time?</p>
<p>Rep. Lamar Smiths “LEGAL WORKFORCE ACT” (H.R. 2885) HELP THE WORKING AMERICANS AND STOP THESE TRAVESTIES OF OUR LAWS.  E-Verify will be a very successful supplement to stopping the illegality of people with foreign status from taking jobs.</p>
<p>The website NumbersUSA is the only outspoken, pro-sovereignty group, which identifies the grading records on a chart that is open to anybodies scrutiny. Below you can see next to every personage in the presidential election, their relative grade and the informational pressing issue of E-Verify.</p>
<p>There are two things that the average American can do, is by adding pressure to mostly the adversity of certain politicians. These reluctant politicians must be bombarded with your calls and free faxes, compliments of NumbersUSA.  Contact Speaker of the House John Boehner (R-OH); House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA); House Majority Whip Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) ; House Chairman of Ways &amp; Means Committee Dave Camp (R-MI);  &amp; Members of the Ways &amp; Means Committee. NEBRASKA, Rep. Berg, Rick (GOP) (202-225-2611) ; NEBRASKA, Rep. Smith, Adrian (GOP) (202-225-6435); LOUISIANA, Rep. Boustany, Charles (GOP) (202-225-2031); MICHIGAN, Rep. Camp, Dave (GOP) (202-225-3561) &amp; (202-225-2031); KENTUCKY, Rep. Davis, Geoff (GOP) (202-225-3465); PENNSYLVANIA, Rep. Gerlach, Jim (GOP) (202-225-4315); KANSAS, Rep. Jenkins, Lynn (GOP)(202-225-6601); MINNESOTA, Rep. Paulsen, Erik (GOP)(202-225-2871); WASHINGTON, Rep. Reichert, Dave (GOP) (202-225-7761); WISCONSIN, Rep. Ryan, Paul (GOP) (202-225-3031) You can additionally contact your own local Senator or Representative or federal politician at 202-224-3121 and insist on E-Verify. Tell them that your voting will depend how you vote on E-Verify—NOW!</p>
<p>At this present time Rick Perry (D-) endorsed E-Verify, but having his reservations, he also called building a 1,200-mile fence the length of the border “idiocy” If we don’t “secure the Border” America is not only open to economic aliens, but dangerous foreigners who will come here- to kill us.   Mitt Romney (C-) at the Conservative Political Action Conference that he supports an E-Verify system, along with Herman Cain (C-) who has qualified himself as a true TEA PARTY member. Michele Bachman (B-), Tea Party chairman believes employers should be required to check the legal status of people they hire with E-Verify. Rep. Newt Gingrich (D-) has not spoken explicitly about E-Verify; he has suggested that credit card companies should run a worker-verification program. Jon Huntsman (D-) said he would consider a requirement that employers use the e-Verify system to check the documentation of workers to ensure they&#8217;re legally employable. Rick Santorum (F), called Mr. Perry “soft on illegal immigration” during the debate, in Orlando, Fla., and framed the issue as a burden to taxpayers. Gary Johnson (F) has also stated, “Enact an application and tracking procedure for guest workers, such as an e-verify system.” Finally Ron Paul (F), who has never answered how he stands on the Illegal alien alerter E-Verify, as he is more interested as it stands on Privacy rights.</p>
<p>Attn: Not all of the thousands of TEA PARTY groups are of the same voice relating to the Presidential contenders. The ad being shown on TV is not the main definition of any particular candidate of any member yet?  Not all TEA PARTY branches are supporting Governor of Texas Rick Perry.  The TEA PARTY—is the American people—of every color, race and religious faith. Everybody qualifies to be a member, as long it entered the United States legally. THE TEA PARTY stands with Arizona, Alabama, Georgia, Indiana, South Carolina and other state policing laws, to save these individual states—ECONOMIC –illegal migrants and immigrants expenditures forced on them by unfunded mandates. The Tea Party will battle against any amnesties or any illegal immigration covert programs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Third Circuit agrees Hazleton, Pa., anti-immigrant ordinances are unconstitutional by Administration appeals Alabama immigration law decision &#124; Scott Kuhagen</title>
		<link>http://scottkuhagen.com/2010/09/14/third-circuit-agrees-hazleton-pa-anti-immigrant-ordinances-are-unconstitutional/#comment-282</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Administration appeals Alabama immigration law decision &#124; Scott Kuhagen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 12:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottkuhagen.com/?p=307#comment-282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] I discussed aspects of the Third Circuit&#8217;s Lozano decision, I discussed the various kinds of preemption [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I discussed aspects of the Third Circuit&#8217;s Lozano decision, I discussed the various kinds of preemption [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on No Rest for a Retired Justice: The First Circuit Decisions of David Souter by Guess I Won&#8217;t Be Counting Stevens&#8217; Circuit Court Opinions &#124; Scott Kuhagen</title>
		<link>http://scottkuhagen.com/2011/07/29/no-rest-for-a-retired-justice-the-first-circuit-decisions-of-david-souter/#comment-278</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guess I Won&#8217;t Be Counting Stevens&#8217; Circuit Court Opinions &#124; Scott Kuhagen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 03:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottkuhagen.com/?p=626#comment-278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] post anytime soon on his activities in the federal appeals courts, like I did last summer regarding David Souter&#8217;s work on First Circuit panels.    LD_AddCustomAttr(&quot;AdOpt&quot;, &quot;1&quot;); LD_AddCustomAttr(&quot;Origin&quot;, &quot;other&quot;); [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] post anytime soon on his activities in the federal appeals courts, like I did last summer regarding David Souter&#8217;s work on First Circuit panels.    LD_AddCustomAttr(&quot;AdOpt&quot;, &quot;1&quot;); LD_AddCustomAttr(&quot;Origin&quot;, &quot;other&quot;); [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Immigrant visas for the right price: the immigration tariff Idea by Postscript: Immigrant visas for the right price &#124; Scott Kuhagen</title>
		<link>http://scottkuhagen.com/2011/09/01/immigrant-visas-for-the-right-price-the-immigration-tariff-idea/#comment-274</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Postscript: Immigrant visas for the right price &#124; Scott Kuhagen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 15:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottkuhagen.com/?p=666#comment-274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Scott Kuhagen   Law student; thoughts on constitutional, immigration, and public interest law    Skip to content HomeAbout        &#8592; Immigrant visas for the right price: the immigration tariff&#160;Idea [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Scott Kuhagen   Law student; thoughts on constitutional, immigration, and public interest law    Skip to content HomeAbout        &larr; Immigrant visas for the right price: the immigration tariff&nbsp;Idea [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

